Difference between revisions of "Why I Created This How to Wiki?"

From Dysprosium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(some corrections)
Line 15: Line 15:
* See, nerds have created these software in this easy way to create works and edit them. Easily one can create such a monument.
* See, nerds have created these software in this easy way to create works and edit them. Easily one can create such a monument.
* So far my articles there have created more than 4,500,000 (four and half million) views that might have created tens of thousands dollars revenue for them and they did not allow even one link to my site.
* So far my articles there have created more than 4,500,000 (four and half million) views that might have created tens of thousands dollars revenue for them and they did not allow even one link to my site.
* I understood they exploit the ideas, creativity and hard work of enthusiasts and then get profit.
* They even do not respect the intellectual property of the creator in no way.
* When you create something they consult internally if that article is profitable for them.
* If they admit it then one of the interns will come and add a "comma" to the text and he becomes a contributor to your work Their response of


== Figure ==
== Figure ==
[[File:Wikihowrecord16_09_2017.PNG|400px|thumb|left|Views of my work 16 September  2017]]
[[File:Wikihowrecord16_09_2017.PNG|400px|thumb|left|Views of my work 16 September  2017]]

Revision as of 11:00, 17 January 2018

Inuse.png
This article is under construction! Please do not edit.

Date : 27/Sep/2017,

Signed : Admin.

This is in preparation

  • As part of my Java teaching for students I created a software many years ago to merge or concatenate pdf documents.
  • Later I found out that this software was useful for other people too, and similar products were not available free.
  • I decided to promote it on my blog "Codes For Us." But how people could find my blog?
  • Later I learned that there were two sites who would allow people to teach how they can do things by themselves: eHow and WikiHow sites. I went there and learned how to write for them and created a link to download my software.
  • I noticed that many people welcome the move and downloaded my software.
  • After a while the eHow locked its site on the public and in place of my software put a commercial software who had paid them for the promotion.
  • WikiHow came ahead and in very friendly way asked me to create a user page and write articles for them and edit and patrol articles of other similar people (like) to me. They said that in this way people could become familiar to my site when they were searching for the producer of the articles.
  • I wrote many articles and every day I spent some time on their site. Gradually I became a Featured Author.
  • At this time they removed my only link to my software and put a paid commercial software in its place.
  • I discovered a similar pattern to this for any other article that could be monetised in this way; they would remove the original free advised ideas with commercial products that owner companies had paid for the promotion.
  • I stopped to work for them and cloned my articles here.
  • See, nerds have created these software in this easy way to create works and edit them. Easily one can create such a monument.
  • So far my articles there have created more than 4,500,000 (four and half million) views that might have created tens of thousands dollars revenue for them and they did not allow even one link to my site.
  • I understood they exploit the ideas, creativity and hard work of enthusiasts and then get profit.
  • They even do not respect the intellectual property of the creator in no way.
  • When you create something they consult internally if that article is profitable for them.
  • If they admit it then one of the interns will come and add a "comma" to the text and he becomes a contributor to your work Their response of

Figure

Views of my work 16 September 2017